Evidence of DEW in Biblical Scripture – Voice-to-Skull and the Blinding Blasting of Saul

Wholly and Perfectly Explicable via DEW — Story of Saul in the Bible notes that he (and companions) heard disembodied voices and then suffered blindness for days. V2K Voice-to-skull technology via LASER and or microwave DEW can cause these exact effects and damages. Testimony and symptoms all match. What if DEW is actually far older than imaged?

Evidence of DEW in Biblical Scripture - Voice-to-Skull and the Blinding Blasting of Saul

Evidence of DEW in Biblical Scripture - Voice-to-Skull and the Blinding Blasting of Saul

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/20668171_Effects_of_microwave_radiation_on_the_eye_The_occupational_health_perspective

Considered in Three layers:

  1. what actually exists in patents/physics for “voice to skull”;
  2. how microwaves/lasers can damage eyes and sometimes cause reversible “greying”;
  3. how Saul’s Damascus experience might map onto those mechanisms as a thought experiment.

1. Real “voice-to-skull”–type technologies and patents

The underlying physics is the microwave auditory effect (MAE), also called the Frey effect: short, pulsed RF/microwave bursts create tiny, rapid heating in tissue around the inner ear or skull bones, generating pressure waves that the auditory system interprets as clicks or simple sounds, perceived inside the head with no external speaker. (Wikipedia)

Researchers and militaries explored whether that effect could be modulated to carry speech. That’s the backbone of what people now label “V2K”.

Key patents often cited in this space:

  • US 4,877,027 – “Hearing system” (Wayne B. Brunkan, 1989)
    Describes inducing sound in a person’s head by irradiating it with microwaves from ~100 MHz to 10 GHz, modulated with a waveform that encodes the audio. The abstract explicitly says the system radiates the head so “sound is induced in the head of the person”. (Scribd)
  • US 6,470,214 – “Method and device for implementing the radio frequency hearing effect” (O’Loughlin & Loree, USAF)
  • And its divisional US 6,587,729 – “Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect.”
    These patents outline modulation schemes (carrier-suppressed AM/SSB, pre-filtering of speech, etc.) so that a pulsed RF beam, when absorbed by a person’s head, produces intelligible subjective sound via the RF hearing effect. Assignee: the U.S. Air Force. (Google Patents)
  • DE 10222439 – “Microwave hearing device” (Leyser)
    A German patent for a device that uses modulated microwave pulses to generate perceived sound directly in the head, intended as a warning system for deaf people. (University of Southampton Web Archive)
  • US 5,159,703 – “Silent subliminal presentation system” (Oliver M. Lowery, 1992)
    Not RF, but ultrasonic/supra-audible acoustic carriers that are modulated with speech to create “silent” subliminals—inaudible to conscious hearing but theoretically detectable subconsciously. It’s frequently lumped into V2K discussions because it encodes messages into carriers that aren’t consciously heard. (Google Patents)
  • Non-lethal “silent audio” weapon concepts: MEDUSA
    The U.S. Navy funded MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) via WaveBand Corp. around 2003–2004: a proposed crowd-control weapon explicitly based on the microwave auditory effect to create a strong, disorienting sound sensation inside the head. Experts later argued that power levels needed for “loud” sound would likely cause harmful heating before they became an effective voice system, and the project does not appear to have gone operational. (Wikipedia)

A few important reality checks, from a physics standpoint:

  • The MAE is real and replicated, but in lab/occupational settings it mainly produces clicks, buzzes, simple tones—speech is harder. (Wikipedia)
  • The patents show that engineers believed you could encode speech, but a patent is not proof of a fielded, covert long-range system.
  • Biophysics experts have repeatedly pointed out that intensities needed for clear, comfortable speech inside the head tend to push toward heating levels that risk tissue damage, which limits practicality, especially at long range. (Wikipedia)
  • Many modern “V2K” complaints in the clinical literature line up with auditory hallucinations or delusional disorders, not demonstrable external beams, even though the basic physics of MAE is sound. (Wikipedia)

So: there is a technical core—microwave auditory effect and related patents—that can in principle deliver simple audio into a person’s perception without a receiver. But the gap between that and a stealthy, reliable, speech-grade “remote mind-voice” weapon is large.


2. Microwaves, lasers, and temporary blindness from corneal greying

Now to the eye.

2.1 Microwave and millimeter-wave effects on the eye

The eye is mostly water with transparent ordered structures (cornea, lens, vitreous). Microwaves and millimeter waves are strongly absorbed in those tissues, converting EM energy to heat. Animal and occupational studies show:

  • Microwave exposures can damage the cornea, lens, and retina.
    Studies in animals and workers exposed to radar/microwave fields report:
  • Corneal endothelial damage and corneal changes
  • Acceleration of cataract formation (lens opacities)
  • Retinal nerve ending degeneration at higher exposures (PubMed)
  • In classic animal experiments at ~5.5 GHz, sufficiently intense exposure produced lens opacities within a few days, while somewhat lower power levels produced no obvious acute effect. (zoryglaser.com)
  • At lower intensities (e.g., 1.1 GHz, milliwatt-level average powers) investigators saw reversible degradation of lens optical quality associated with structural/molecular changes—some functional changes reversed even if subtle biochemical alterations persisted. (PMC)
  • Millimeter-wave (40–95 GHz) experiments on rabbit eyes produced reduced corneal transparency, a round central opacity, and corneal edema that peaked ~1 day after exposure, then gradually resolved with corneal thickness and transparency returning toward normal. (SpringerLink)

This matches your idea of:

greying / whitening of the cornea + temporary blindness + partial or full recovery

—because corneal edema and structural disturbance scatter light, turning the normally clear cornea into a hazy, whitish surface. If the injury is below a certain threshold, edema and microstructural disruption can resolve over days as cells pump fluid out and collagen re-orders, restoring transparency.

There are also non-microwave examples of transient corneal whitening:

  • Needle diathermy procedures (using RF current) can produce transient corneal opacity and whitening in the adjacent stroma, resolving in 24–48 hours. (MDPI)
  • Corneal edema from surgery, infection, or metabolic stress can cause painless, transient “foggy” or even functional blindness that often clears over a few days if the underlying insult is removed. (Cleveland Clinic)
  • Ultramarathon-induced corneal edema (UMICE): distance runners sometimes get transient corneal edema with blurry vision or temporary blindness that resolves spontaneously—again, a reversible opacity/greying. (ScienceDirect)

So the pattern “whitening → temporary loss of sight → relatively quick recovery when insult stops” is biophysically real.

Microwave/ millimeter-wave exposures can clearly produce eye effects including transient opacity and longer-term cataracts, depending on dose and duration. (PubMed)

2.2 Laser eye effects

Lasers are more familiar:

  • Retinal injuries (from visible/near-IR lasers) can cause sudden vision loss, then partial recovery over weeks if edema resolves and scar formation is limited. (AAO)
  • Corneal laser injuries can cause haze/edema and decreased vision, sometimes reversible, sometimes permanent if the stroma is badly damaged. (PMC)

Modern microwave-based procedures like microwave keratoplasty deliberately heat a corneal ring to reshape the cornea, showing that controlled microwave heating can be used therapeutically—but also causes localized extracellular matrix disruption and haze if overdone. (Nature)

2.3 Can one beam cause both V2K and temporary corneal greying?

Purely as a physics question:

  • The microwave auditory effect generally uses pulsed RF that penetrates the head and deposits a small amount of energy near the cochlea or adjacent tissues, creating thermoelastic pressure waves the ear detects as sound. (Wikipedia)
  • The eye is up front; it will absorb microwave power as well, especially in the cornea and lens.

So yes, in principle:

  • A beam tuned to MAE frequencies and pulsed appropriately could also dump heat into the cornea and lens, potentially causing edema or early opacities.
  • If power and exposure duration are high enough to noticeably whiten the cornea, they’re already well into a regime where you’re risking eye damage—though mild injury can be reversible, as above.

However, a lot of expert commentary on MAE-based weapons stresses that by the time the sound is loud and clean enough to act as a robust communication system, you’re near or beyond safe thermal limits for other tissues, not just the eye. (Wikipedia)

So a fully weaponized “V2K beam that also selectively whitens the cornea but magically avoids everything else” is not impossible in principle, but it’s a narrow design space: you’d have to precisely manage power, beam profile, dwell time, and target geometry. There’s no public documentation that anyone has truly mastered that cocktail.


3. Saul on the Damascus road: a directed-energy thought experiment

3.1 What the text actually says

Key elements from Acts 9 (plus parallel tellings in Acts 22 & 26):

  • A sudden, intense light from heaven flashes around Saul and his companions on the road to Damascus.
  • Saul falls to the ground and hears a voice: “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” He dialogues with the voice (“Who are you, Lord?” “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting…”). (Bible Gateway)
  • The companions see the light and “hear the sound” but don’t see anyone and, depending on the account, don’t understand the words. (Bible Gateway)
  • When Saul gets up and opens his eyes, he cannot see. They lead him by the hand into Damascus. He is blind for three days, during which he neither eats nor drinks. (Bible Gateway)
  • After Ananias lays hands on him, “something like scales fell from Saul’s eyes, and he regained his sight.” (Bible Hub)

Traditional Christian interpretation focuses on spiritual symbolism (blinding light of revelation, death to the old self over three days, scales as spiritual blindness dropping away). Medical writers have suggested possibilities like psychogenic blindness, migraine/epileptic phenomena, solar retinopathy, or ocular inflammation. (Hektoen International)

You asked specifically to explore it as if it might be an early description of a microwave/laser-type event. So let’s map it mechanically.

3.2 Mapping features to modern injury phenomenology

  1. The brilliant light
  • Could correspond to any intense optical/UV EM transient: lightning, a meteor/bolide, high-energy plasma, or in high-tech terms, a powerful laser or flash lamp.
  • Photochemical or thermal retinal injury from an intense light source can produce immediate loss or distortion of vision, sometimes with partial recovery over days/weeks if damage is limited. (AAO)
  1. The voice
  • The text says the companions heard something—they’re “speechless; they heard the sound but saw no one.” (Bible Gateway)
  • That is not a clean microwave-auditory signature. A pure MAE-produced voice in Saul’s head, with no external acoustic component, would ordinarily be inaudible to companions, whereas here they at least hear a sound or noise.
  • If you were designing a “theatrical” DEW scenario with our physics, you might imagine:
    • a visible/UV flash (plasma or laser) that everyone sees,
    • acoustic thunder or shock that everyone hears,
    • and optionally a microwave-auditory superimposed message perceived mainly by Saul.
  • But: nothing in the text forces the voice to be microwave-based; ordinary acoustic plus visionary experience also fits.
  1. Three days of blindness with later, sudden resolution and “scales” This is where your “temporary corneal greying, then cure” idea is most interesting. Modern analogues that look vaguely similar:
  • Corneal edema / transient corneal opacity
    • From microwave/millimeter-wave exposure: experiments show corneal opacity and edema that peaks within a day and then subsides as the cornea recovers, with thickness and transparency normalizing. (SpringerLink)
    • From diathermy, trauma, surgery, or metabolic stress: transient whitening/opacity resolving within 1–3 days is documented. (MDPI)
    • Subjectively, patients may describe a fog, clouding, or “film” over the eye that later “clears” or “falls away.”
  • Epithelial sloughing / “scales” image
    • When damaged corneal epithelium heals, you can literally get loosening and sloughing of devitalized epithelial layers or fibrin, which would look like little flakes, filmy sheets, or crusts detaching from the ocular surface.
    • The phrase “something like scales fell from his eyes” is an ancient metaphor, but it does line up with how peeling epithelial debris or fibrin membranes can appear in modern slit-lamp examinations. (Bible Hub)
  • Time course
    • Many reversible corneal conditions resolve in 1–3 days once the insult stops: e.g., mild photokeratitis (“snow blindness”), some edematous states, superficial injuries.
    • Saul’s three days of blindness, then sudden clearing, is quite compatible with a reversible corneal/epithelial disorder rather than a full, permanent retinal burn.

So if we imagine a directed-energy scenario, a plausible modern template would be:

  • A very intense light/EM flash delivering energy to the anterior eye (cornea/epithelium, maybe lens) causing acute edema and surface damage, leaving Saul functionally blind.
  • Over roughly three days, edema subsides and epithelium regenerates. When healing reaches a tipping point, loose necrotic epithelium/scarring detaches (“scales”), rapidly improving vision.

From a microwave/laser standpoint, that’s not crazy: we know short but intense exposures can do exactly that kind of “injure → white → heal over a few days” pattern in corneas.

3.3 Does the Damascus story really “look like” V2K?

Putting it together:

  • What lines up:
  • Sudden sensory event (light + sound/voice).
  • Rapid onset of blindness without described burns or obvious bodily trauma.
  • Blindness lasting on the order of days, not minutes or lifelong.
  • A seemingly abrupt restoration of sight with a “scales falling off” sensation/image—very reminiscent of resolution of a surface opacity or edema.
  • What doesn’t line up well with modern V2K / MAE weapons:
  • The companions perceive some of the sound and all see the light. V2K/MAE-only audio should be invisible to bystanders. (Bible Gateway)
  • There’s no description of localized skin heating, burns, or other RF-type injury. At RF power levels high enough to cause both MAE speech and significant eye damage, you’d expect broader thermal effects. (Wikipedia)
  • Historically, we have zero evidence of 1st-century human technology involving gigahertz beam generation, focusing, and power handling. To argue for literal “ancient microwave weapons” usually ends up invoking non-human or lost ultra-advanced civilizations, which is more metaphysical than evidential.

So as a truth-seeking but open-minded scientist-exegete, I’d say:

  • Saul’s story is strikingly compatible with some kind of intense EM/light event causing reversible corneal/ocular injury, if you want a physical lens. The three-day course and “scales” imagery line up surprisingly well with modern corneal edema/epithelial injury dynamics. (SpringerLink)
  • The “voice” part does not require microwave auditory tech; the text actually points more toward a phenomenon that produced sound for multiple witnesses, not a private RF voice in Saul’s head.
  • The V2K / microwave auditory patents show that modern engineers can, at least in principle, write messages into a person’s auditory perception via RF. But that doesn’t retrofit automatically onto Acts 9; it just gives us a physical analog for the idea of voices without visible speakers.

Bottom line

  • There is a real cluster of patents and research around the microwave auditory effect and “silent audio” that can plausibly produce internal sound perception, including some speech, with no conventional receiver. (Wikipedia)
  • There is solid biomedical evidence that microwaves, millimeter waves, and lasers can cause corneal greying/opacity and temporary blindness that may resolve over days as edema clears and damaged epithelium sloughs—very reminiscent of “scales” falling away. (SpringerLink)
  • Reading Saul’s Damascus encounter through this lens is an interesting speculative exercise: the timing and imagery map surprisingly well onto reversible ocular injury, but the narrative context, lack of broader physical trauma, and theological framing mean we cannot honestly claim it was a literal ancient microwave/laser weapon based on current evidence.

Evidence of DEW in Biblical Scripture - Voice-to-Skull and the Blasting of Saul

Evidence of DEW in Biblical Scripture - Voice-to-Skull and the Blinding Blasting of Saul

Visited 7 times, 7 visit(s) today

Leave a Comment

Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!