In December 2024, the “collapsed” Oliveira Bridge in Brazil fell faster than Gravity — on video, it ‘falls out from under’ the motorcycle — which goes substantially airborne and twists, both impossible without application of external force — and it falls out from under the truck driver whose body and ‘air ride’ throne visibly ‘levitate’ whilst the bridge is pulled- or forced-down ‘out from under’ them, faster than the acceleration due to the force of Gravity. In other words, what is shown is physically impossible without the addition of energy to cause the ‘faster than free-fall’ observed. It’s as is Gravity is being increased for heavy and/or metal objects, or there is presence of substantial magnetic repulsion for metal objects, all caused by energy applied in this strongly evidenced DEW Attack.
This same effect was famously seen in all 911 WTC videos which showed the WTC ‘falling faster than gravity’; this effect was later calculated by Dr Judy Wood in her WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO book and youtube presentations. The same effect was also captured on video in the very strongly suspected similar take-down via DEW Attack of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge in March 2024. The Directed Energy Weapons ostensibly used in all events imparted an electro-gravitic / electro-magnetic energy that caused / pushed / pulled the large, metal structures to ‘fall faster than gravity’ and thus (otherwise impossibly) “fall out from under” objects, people, vehicles. All effects seen defeated all physical impediments such as friction, utterly magically and mysteriously …until energy imparted by DEW Attack is figured.
That the bridge “fell” faster than the motorcycle (and truck) is proof that energy was added — either pulling the bridge down, or pushing it down.
Premises
A DEW blast was used to take-down the Oliveira Bridge in Brazil Dec 2024.
There is an powerful magnetic component to every DEW blast, in part as inescapable side-effect of the energy beam itself, and in part due to magnetic “eddy currents” induced in metals (particularly flat sheets, which self-wrumple and crumple and crinkle like huge tin-foil sheets) impinged upon by the beamed energies.
This magnetic effect (which may be, or appear to be, “electro-gravitic / anti-gravity”) is what distorts (usually inwards) the numerous shipping containers “magnetically shoved” in the many and growing number of tractor-trailer rollover “accidents”. Same with trains and their metal shipping containers, gondolas, box-cars, and tanker-vessels. Same with metal rooves (houses and vehicles, and their hoods and trunks/boots) and corrugated metal sidings anywhere (including the side of the green/blue truck seen in the Oliveira Bridge take-down).
The same magnetic force propelled the World Trade Centers WTC sky-scrapers downward faster than gravity, as shown on every video and verified mathematically by Dr Judy Wood: A bowling ball dropped from the roof of the trade towers would have landed AFTER the towers — as impossible as that seems and sounds, it is in fact exactly what would have happened — the towers were pulled down and/or driven down.
This same magnetically-driven faster-than-gravity “fall” appears also in the footage of the “flying motorcycle” and the “levitating truck-driver” captured during the Oliveira Bridge take-down in Dec 2024.
Here is an evidence- and physics-based technical analysis of the speeds of objects falling vs the speeds of objects being ‘helped along’ downwards (faster than otherwise due to only the force of gravity) by electro-gravitic / electro-magnetic energies ostensibly imparted by DEW Attack.
See Also
Video Frames per Second
Video speed is normally 30 frames per second, or 0.033 seconds time lapse between each “frame” of video (which is a single, full-size, full-resolution, complete image on modern cameras). Older cameras “shot” fewer frames per second (and thus more time between each frame in each second). Even older cameras (NTSC-era) used “interlaced frames” technique to lessen the technical burden and assuage consequent visual artifacts objectionable to humans.
In-frame Speeds
Video of one truck shows 21 km/hr speed (13.05 mph).
Video from another vehicle shows 9 km/hr speed (5.59 mph).
That’s a span of 2x to 4x the speed of casual human walking. In typic “traffic-jam-jargon”, that’s “crawling” in a “bumper-to-bumper” traffic jam.
Because the in-camera speeds differ by a factor of 2x and all videos show placement within heavy traffic on the bridge, it seems likely that traffic one way was moving ~13 mph, and traffic the other way was moving ~6 mph. This is reasonable.
The truck speed shows 21 km/hr speed. The flying motorcycle appear in the truck’s rearward-facing camera; therefore, the motorcycle’s fastest possible constant speed in heavy traffic was 9 km/hr (~6 mph); slightly greater acceleration may have been possible in the natural, constantly varying, short distance gaps between motorcycle and its nearest leading vehicle (the dark pickup truck).
Acceleration due to Gravity
At free-fall (meaning no resistance except atmospheric),
Gravity accelerates a free‑falling object at about 9.81 m/s^2.
Since 1 m/s ≈ 2.23694 mph, that’s roughly 9.81 × 2.23694 ≈ 21.9 mph gained every second (ignoring naturally resistance of atmosphere, swirling air currents, etc).
So after 1 second, free-fall speed would be ~21.9 mph, after 2 seconds: ~43.8 mph, and so on.
Acceleration due to Gravity, every 33 milliseconds
Table listing every 30 frames per second (0.033 second periods), the acceleration due to the force of Gravity, in feet per second and miles per hour. Ground must accelerate downward like free-fall (a = g ≈ 32.174 ft/s²). The table below shows the downward speed the pavement would need at each 33 ms tick so the bike / vehicle / person / object can’t keep up; once the surface’s downward acceleration reaches g, contact breaks immediately.
| t (s) | v (ft/s) | v (mph) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 0.033 | 1.062 | 0.724 |
| 0.066 | 2.123 | 1.448 |
| 0.099 | 3.185 | 2.172 |
| 0.132 | 4.247 | 2.896 |
| 0.165 | 5.309 | 3.620 |
| 0.198 | 6.370 | 4.343 |
| 0.231 | 7.432 | 5.067 |
| 0.264 | 8.494 | 5.791 |
| 0.297 | 9.556 | 6.515 |
| 0.330 | 10.617 | 7.239 |
| 0.363 | 11.679 | 7.963 |
| 0.396 | 12.741 | 8.687 |
| 0.429 | 13.803 | 9.411 |
| 0.462 | 14.864 | 10.135 |
| 0.495 | 15.926 | 10.859 |
| 0.528 | 16.988 | 11.583 |
| 0.561 | 18.050 | 12.307 |
| 0.594 | 19.111 | 13.030 |
| 0.627 | 20.173 | 13.754 |
| 0.660 | 21.235 | 14.478 |
| 0.693 | 22.297 | 15.202 |
| 0.726 | 23.358 | 15.926 |
| 0.759 | 24.420 | 16.650 |
| 0.792 | 25.482 | 17.374 |
| 0.825 | 26.544 | 18.098 |
| 0.858 | 27.605 | 18.822 |
| 0.891 | 28.667 | 19.546 |
| 0.924 | 29.729 | 20.270 |
| 0.957 | 30.791 | 20.994 |
| 0.990 | 31.852 | 21.717 |
| 1.023 | 32.914 | 22.441 |
| 1.056 | 33.976 | 23.165 |
| 1.089 | 35.037 | 23.889 |
| 1.122 | 36.099 | 24.613 |
| 1.155 | 37.161 | 25.337 |
| 1.188 | 38.223 | 26.061 |
| 1.221 | 39.284 | 26.785 |
| 1.254 | 40.346 | 27.509 |
| 1.287 | 41.408 | 28.233 |
| 1.320 | 42.470 | 28.957 |
| 1.353 | 43.531 | 29.681 |
| 1.386 | 44.593 | 30.404 |
| 1.419 | 45.655 | 31.128 |
| 1.452 | 46.717 | 31.852 |
| 1.485 | 47.778 | 32.576 |
| 1.518 | 48.840 | 33.300 |
| 1.551 | 49.902 | 34.024 |
| 1.584 | 50.964 | 34.748 |
| 1.617 | 52.025 | 35.472 |
| 1.650 | 53.087 | 36.196 |
| 1.683 | 54.149 | 36.920 |
| 1.716 | 55.211 | 37.644 |
| 1.749 | 56.272 | 38.367 |
| 1.782 | 57.334 | 39.091 |
| 1.815 | 58.396 | 39.815 |
| 1.848 | 59.458 | 40.539 |
| 1.881 | 60.519 | 41.263 |
| 1.914 | 61.581 | 41.987 |
| 1.947 | 62.643 | 42.711 |
| 1.980 | 63.705 | 43.435 |
| 2.013 | 64.766 | 44.159 |
| 2.046 | 65.828 | 44.883 |
| 2.079 | 66.890 | 45.607 |
| 2.112 | 67.951 | 46.331 |
| 2.145 | 69.013 | 47.054 |
| 2.178 | 70.075 | 47.778 |
| 2.211 | 71.137 | 48.502 |
| 2.244 | 72.198 | 49.226 |
| 2.277 | 73.260 | 49.950 |
| 2.310 | 74.322 | 50.674 |
| 2.343 | 75.384 | 51.398 |
| 2.376 | 76.445 | 52.122 |
| 2.409 | 77.507 | 52.846 |
| 2.442 | 78.569 | 53.570 |
| 2.475 | 79.631 | 54.294 |
| 2.508 | 80.692 | 55.018 |
| 2.541 | 81.754 | 55.741 |
| 2.574 | 82.816 | 56.465 |
| 2.607 | 83.878 | 57.189 |
| 2.640 | 84.939 | 57.913 |
| 2.673 | 86.001 | 58.637 |
| 2.706 | 87.063 | 59.361 |
| 2.739 | 88.125 | 60.085 |
| 2.772 | 89.186 | 60.809 |
| 2.805 | 90.248 | 61.533 |
| 2.838 | 91.310 | 62.257 |
Any structure collapsing with these downward speeds (or faster) at each moment is accelerating at 1 g, so anything resting on it loses contact immediately and becomes airborne.
Plain English Explanation of Physical Effects
When you see a bridge deck or patch of ground “drop out from under” a vehicle, what’s happening is that the structure starts accelerating downward at or above 1 g while the vehicle’s inertia briefly keeps it where it was. Because the contact force can only push up, the instant the structure’s downward acceleration reaches gravity the normal force goes to zero, and the vehicle is no longer supported—it begins its own free fall. If the structure keeps accelerating downward faster than free fall (for example, because it’s being pulled or pushed by collapsing trusses or cables), it can outrun the vehicle visibly, so the gap between them opens.
So yes: all that’s required is that the deck or ground achieve a downward acceleration at least equal to gravity. That can happen in several ways:
- Structural snap-through: When a support element fails suddenly, stored elastic energy can yank the deck downward with >1 g acceleration for a short interval, causing the surface to leave contact even with stationary loads. – Pivoting sections: If one end of a span drops while the far end is still hinged, the rotation can impart a large downward acceleration near the break, tossing vehicles upward relative to the falling surface. – Seismic motion: During an earthquake, the ground can experience transient accelerations greater than 1 g in any direction. If the vertical component exceeds 1 g downward, anything resting on that ground loses contact, even if it was initially at rest.
Once contact breaks, both the surface and the vehicle are just projectiles under gravity, but their initial velocities can differ: the deck might already be moving downward faster than the vehicle, so it appears to “fall away.”
A fourth manner which can cause a structure to ‘fall faster than gravity’ would be an electro-gravitic pull (an increase of gravity force impinging upon an heavy object) of the structure relative to its foundation; a fifth would be an electro-magnetic push causing magnetic repulsion from an energy beam or other eletro-magnetic field or presence.
Those would amount to additional forces acting on the structure:
- An “electro‑gravitic pull” would just add extra downward force, increasing the deck’s downward acceleration beyond 1 g and making it leave the vehicles even sooner. In mainstream physics there isn’t experimental evidence for controllable electro-gravity, but conceptually it fits the same framework: more downward force = more downward acceleration.
- A strong electromagnetic repulsion pushing the structure downward — say, powerful fields reacting against another field — would again supply extra downward force, so the surface could outrun free-fall for a while if the push exceeded the deck’s weight.
Both cases reduce to Newton’s second law: whatever force drives the structure sets its acceleration. Once that acceleration hits g, contact vanishes regardless of what produced the force.
Also impossibly absent from these calculations is the slowing / retarding effect of friction as the bridge (and the WTC floors) materials impact and/or grind-against each other, appreciably slowing the fall. The incredible speed of the “collapse” completely negates the physical reality that otherwise would retard the collapse substantially, thus keeping the trucker in his seat and the motorcycle from going airborn. That such seeming levitation did occur on-video proves the bridge was made to fall faster than due to the force of Gravity. There is no other scientifically plausible conclusion.
Levitation of Truck Driver (and his throne)
The fear in the driver’s face and his reflexive body movement; the lurch as the bridge (and the truck) fall out from underneath the driver (and his throne!) The in-truck-cab video shows truck driver suddenly rise (along with his “air-ride” drivers seat) within the span of two frames.
The Flying Motorcycle
In order for any motorcyclist anywhere to become “air-borne” due to the roadway falling out from underneath the wheels, regardless of weight or “inertia” of the motorcycle, that roadway would have to fall away at any speed faster than the accelerative force of Gravity.
Also highly interesting about the motorcyclist: At the first and second frames after having ‘gone airborne’, the motorcycle itself seems to slightly ‘fall out from under the rider’ (and also begin to twist, despite its wheel never being steered away from straight-ahead), as if the motorcycle’s weight and/or mostly metal material was also gravitically and/or magnetically affected by the DEW beam moreso than the rider. This is most curious. Videos of Evil Kneival and the numerous motorcycle (and BMX bicycle) jumpers ever since never show any mid-air turning or twisting. The energy causing the motorcycle to visibly twist (on its vertical axis normal to the Earth) is presumably imparted by the DEW beam.
