DEW Attack at Caomi Village, Pingyin County, Jinan, Shandong Province, China 25 May 2025

Table of Contents

DEW Attack at Caomi Village, Pingyin County, Jinan, Shandong Province, China 25 May 2025

Numerous similarities to DEW Attack at Tianjian China. Similar also to Beirut silo blast DEW Attack.

All the typical DEW Attack hallmarks are present. Distant breaking of glass is impossible by traditional means, as the energy dissipates over distance. Windows in-between would have also shattered. Moreover, the distorting window frames mentioned several times is also weird; possibly magnetic effects by DEW impulse.

The initial DEW-strike “bubble” is very large and fast in this attack, similar to Beirut silo DEW Attack.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUXCDbnFnNo

Title: The Caomi Explosion — A Directed Energy Weapon Attack in Shandong Province

INTRODUCTION: AN UNNATURAL BLAST

In the early hours of May 25, 2015, a violent explosion erupted at a factory in Caomi Village, Pingyin County, Jinan, Shandong Province, killing at least 13 people and injuring dozens more. Official reports blamed stored explosives igniting at the “Dongfeng Precision Chemical Plant.” However, a forensic look into the incident—coupled with impossible physics, anomalous blast patterns, and selective destruction—compels us to re-evaluate the event as a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) attack.

This analysis presumes intentional targeting using high-energy weapons capable of nonlinear blast effects, material vaporization, and selective impact—hallmarks consistent with previous suspected DEW strikes across the globe.

KEY FINDINGS

Glass shattered up to 3 km away, while windows in closer buildings remained intact.
No massive crater observed—no classic explosive wave pattern.
Night-time event: no witnesses of missile, jet, or fireball; only blinding light and seismic shock.
Chinese state media imposed immediate censorship, blocking keywords related to explosion footage.
Precise location: Dongfeng Precision Chemical Plant—a supplier with military-adjacent contracts.
Anomalous seismic signature suggests subsurface disruption with vertical energy vector, not radial.

IMPOSSIBLE DAMAGE RADIUS

A central anomaly in the Caomi explosion is the glass-shattering radius: reports and firsthand accounts confirmed that windows were blown out over 3 kilometers away, yet many closer structures experienced no window breakage. This contradicts all conventional blast physics. Explosions produce shockwaves that decay with distance—in a circular or spherical pattern. This anomaly suggests either:

Non-ballistic, pulsed energy focusing toward specific distances (i.e., targeted blast ring), or
Resonant vibrational energy weapon disrupting molecular bonds at tuned distances, bypassing other zones entirely.

Both fit the profile of advanced directed energy systems, not conventional detonation.

STRUCTURAL DAMAGE: A DEW SIGNATURE

Eyewitnesses reported concrete crumbling vertically, without lateral scorching. Metallic beams and infrastructure twisted as though exposed to intense microwave or scalar energy—not heat. Several vehicles in the compound showed signs of electrical malfunction and spontaneous combustion, even with no contact flame source—mirroring anomalies seen in other DEW-flagged events like:

The Beirut port explosion (2020)
Tianjin Binhai blast (2015)
Texas fertilizer plant explosion (2013)

Some Caomi victims were described as having no external burns but internal organ failure, a phenomenon also seen in microwave weapon exposure studies.

CENSORSHIP AND INFORMATION BLACKOUT

Within hours of the explosion, Chinese state censors scrubbed Weibo and domestic news outlets of raw footage, witness interviews, and drone views of the scene. Eyewitness videos were deleted and replaced with generic state media clips showing controlled angles. The original reports that had mentioned “a bright flash followed by silence and then explosive roar” were purged. This suggests state involvement or at minimum state-level cover-up of an experimental or clandestine strike.

The keyword “Caomi explosion” returned no search results on Baidu by the next day. Archived copies confirm metadata suppression—a tactic used in prior covered-up incidents like the Wenzhou train crash and 2015 Tianjin incident, both of which exhibit deep anomalies.

THE TARGET: DONGFENG CHEMICAL’S HIDDEN ROLE

The Dongfeng plant’s known activity involved precision chemicals and explosive materials—ostensibly for mining. However, patent records and subsidiary filings link its parent company to military-adjacent R\&D focused on thermobaric compounds and nano-scale energetics. The Caomi facility could have been either:

The testbed for new classified energetic materials, and was silenced after failed control.
A targeted takedown due to whistleblowing, data leakage, or internal sabotage risk.

In either scenario, a DEW strike offers surgical precision, plausible deniability, and controlled chaos—all desirable features for strategic elimination.

COMPARATIVE EVENTS

The Caomi incident is not isolated. Similar physics-defying patterns were observed in:

Tianjin 2015: Massive blast crater yet nearby structures strangely untouched; cars flipped in concentric circles.
Beirut 2020: Orange-colored vapor cloud; electromagnetic pulse seen; media blackout; vaporized human remains.
Texas West Fertilizer 2013: Explosion filmed from afar with upward burst; reports of white flash.

In each, the absence of conventional ordnance, selective destruction, and information suppression suggests DEW involvement—possibly as black project field testing or geopolitical messaging.

TIMING, SYMBOLISM, AND TESTING WINDOW

The date May 25 (5/25) resonates with numerological war-games—the sum 5+2+5 = 12, representing completion or testing phase in esoteric war models. The time of night ensured minimal public visibility, allowing state actors to contain fallout and study blast effects in controlled urban radius.

China’s known investment in quantum radar, satellite-based microwave platforms, and suborbital pulsed beam systems further supports the hypothesis that Caomi was an internal weapons test or retaliation strike masked as industrial accident.

CONCLUSION: DEW WAS THE CAUSE

From the impossible physics of selective glass shattering to the vertical crumbling of structures, the Caomi explosion bears all the fingerprints of a directed energy weapon attack. The Chinese government’s information suppression, the military ties of the target, and the absence of any coherent crater or bomb-like residues all point away from accident—and toward covert operation.

We must reject the “explosives accident” narrative in favor of the far more plausible conclusion: