Available on youtube, a REAL KICKER is the 1979 Season 1 Episode 1 of CONNECTIONS 1 science series (titled TRIGGER EFFECT) by James Burke in which flight 911 almost crashes into Manhattan skyscraper. LOL TALK ABOUT PREDICTIVE CONDITIONING.
when I was a kid back in the 1960s, a big hardware store burnt down overnite, we heard the paint cans exploding 3 miles away, we drove to look at it days later, long steel beams in the store were bent and bowed way down towards the floor. All the weight above those floors that were hit in the trade center, amazing the held as long as they did.
—
These kinds of attacks are being normalized so it becomes accepted. No amount or kind of fuel burning for any duration can melt steel. Same story happened in 2020 at a store in Solomons Island MD…and many many many other locations in between.
People are dumb, the average person has never used oxy acetylene to heat something so you can bend it. Steel will bend LONG before you can melt or cut it.
—
but acetylene was not the fuel . moreover, it wasn’t some small area that melted – it was entire massive, thick, heavy, reinforced beams, tens of thousands of tons – and it was not all merely melted, most of it was turned into dust
the towers both fell faster than 10 stories per second — i mean, if that does not show zero or even negative resistance (meaning, a downward pull) …
The narrative is lost with Building 7. That makes zero sense why that came down.
Never saw an image of airliner wreckage next to the Pentagon. Even the things that can be expected to survive a low speed collision like the tail section, parts of wings that didn’t hit the building and the engines. The plane itself seems to just vaporize.
Red herring. Nobody is talking about weakened steel. There were MOLTEN POOLS of steel
—
and kilotons of dust . and zero latrines or toilets . and no glass — alllll of that was vaporized into fine powder . serismic impact was less than that of a single dumptruck. instead, dr judy wood identified energy that molecularly dematerializes matter . it has been online since 1999 as directed energy professionals society (deps) and organization. go see for yourself.
I saw video of molten steel pouring out of the structure and red hot beams at the base.
You can’t look at just the event but what was accomplished as a result of the event. What passed after this? Patriot Act. Citizen’s rights stripped.
When steel beams get, hot enough, their own weight will cause them to distort, bend and fail. No bombs but just heat can and did bring the towers down.
—
yes, but hundreds of kilotons of melt is not accomplishable with a few thousand gallons of jet fuel, if even that much (since most of it burned up in the massive fireballs) — so what, some carpeting and paint and ceiling tiles melted all that steel, kilotons of it … LOL … man have i got some riverfront property to sell to you!!
Buildings 1-2-7 were the ones that collapsed on 11 September 2001. What do we get with 1-2-7? 12/7, or December 7. Pearl Harbour. Am I the only one who noticed this?
—
well every building with wtc prefix (all 7 of them) were profoundly damaged, one completely obliterated, another mostly gutted out internally down to ground level. the steel and concrete were powderized by the resonance energy weaponry evidenced by dr judy wood
Where is the video evidence of a plane crashing into the Pentagon? Oh that’s right, there isn’t any.
Very interesting! I have always thought that the failure of the girders was due to softening of the steel not melting. I had not previously heard about the thermal expansion of the beams causing the collapse of building seven.
—
the resulting distortions and deformations of the remaining structural steel beams are astonishing. moreover, all the beam-end bolts / rivets vanished– try to find even one (of hundreds of thousands) in any image or video. moreover, most of the material was turned into dust — seismic impact was measured as less than that of a dumptruck rumbling by — those buildings were turned into dust before they hit the ground, all falling at faster than 10 floors per second. LOL. energy beam. dr judy wood. hers is the only avenue that is not insane. what a complete turn-around once people finally get the full evidence . FIRE. CAN. NOT. DO. THE. DAMAGE.
I’ve seen other engineers and demolition experts with the exact opposite opinions about the buildings falling. And, there are a LOT Of problems with the narrative on 9/11. The owner of 4,5,7 obtained substantial insurance coverage on the World Trade Center properties he had just leased a few months beforehand, and that happened only weeks before the attacks; Why was there 2 large dumps of airline stocks the week before it happened; Are we to believe that one of the hijackers passports was found unscathed?; BBC Claimed it was an error, but they did report that building 7 had fallen before it actually fell – a building that didnt get directly hit so it was quite odd; why was the metal all hauled away immediately without allowing any examination; etc
—
the pre-reporting was done on-purpose to confound and get everyone in-fighting —- Oliver Stone’s JFK movie has that part where Mister X (donald sutherland) describes reading about the JFK murder in Ozzie newspapers with details prior to release in America. They do this kind of trickery all the time. It causes everyone to in-fight instead of seek truth.
So how did that third 55 story building collapse again when no plane hit it? What about the traces of thermate (weaponized thermite) in the debris. What happened to all the gold stored at the bottom of one of the towers? Just vaporized it guess. Never found even a trace after complete excavation of the site. Pretty savvy of the owner of the trade centers to insure against terrorism 6 months before the attack and get paid billions. I usually trust PragerU but I find the perpetuation of the this made up story of terrorists to be disappointing.
—
hutchison effect is all the 911 anomalies in the military lab. it requires microwave rf, particle beam, high-voltage gradient. hurricane erin provided the high-voltage gradient in the atmosphere. the microwave rf was from aircraft and/or surrounding buildings (and within the towers and also likely the antennae atop the towers!) the particle beam was fired from brookhaven “rhic” 61.1 miles away at an angle of 119 degrees (and headquartered in building 911 on the bnl campues) – every fact independently verifiable today. over two hundred families around brookhaven rhic are suing government for contamination of their ground water by tritium — turns out tritium is a well known byproduct of the rhic energy beam experiment, er, weapon. 911 was a deep, cross-speciality synthesis; not realizing or understanding does not make it false…we just have to dig deeper, explore more broadly to finally ‘get it’. seeing how all govs all at once turned against all citizenry in the pfaucian bargain around 2020 surely woke up most minds to actually really truly being targeted…and that energy has come back around to 911 and what really happened… 911 411 organization goes much deeper
Sure, steel will bend when heated enough.. Also true, is that heat rises upward. So why did the steel structures below the fire, which were not heated, not continue to support the structures above its weight? Those steel structures below the fire had been supporting the fire ravaged area’s weight for years, before the fires broke out. What “witchcraft” then, caused the steel below the fires to weaken, and cause a total collapse of the towers? Yeah, I thought so…
Several hundred tons of material crashing down. It’s a domino effect.
—
untrue — less than one dumptruck of seismic impact hit the ground .. most of the material was powderized into fine dust that kept breaking down and misting away for months afterward. the material itself was dematerialized by the resonance energy beam attack. research DR JUDY WOOD and HUTCHISON EFFECT when you are ready to go deeper into military high tech .. the 110 stories “fell” in under 10 seconds; that’s ten floors per second. LOL. No, there wasn’t just “no resistance”, there was most likely a negative resistance, a vacuum void , an implosion, caused by the material being catatrophically imploded by the resonance energy assault.
why were no jet engines found at the pentagon? Did they “melt”?
What about the spouts of molten steel that were seen flowing out of the towers? That’s not just softened, that’s liquefied. And all the ear witnesses who heard explosions in the minutes before impact? The steel beams cut at precise angles like shape charges? The thermite residue found in the dust? The NIST simulation of Building 7 that stopped at the beginning of the collapse, presumably because they couldn’t get it to look like the free fall that did occur? The intense heat that lasted for months at ground zero? And on and on…
when our govt leaders lie to us, we lose trust in what they say. Govt always think they know better than the average American. Especially the dems.
Building 7 was not hit by a jet.
so how did two planes take down three (and then all 7) WTC towers? only genius people may respond
What a load of load .. if you put “fireproofing” over a backyard steel grill — fireproofing in the form of a steak or hamburger or hotdog roll, the steel grate still will never melt. It won’t weaken; it won’t become half as strong; it won’t deform. These guys are paid shills and liars. Use your brains, people.
‘The Third Terrorist’, by Jayna Davs is about the Oklahoma City bombing. There are some intriguing connections between it and the 9/11 attacks.
—
WTC is 61.1 miles at angle of 119 degress to RHIC particle beam at Brookhaven Natl Labs, line-of-sight.
Murrah is 666 miles from particle beam at Fermilab, line-of-sight.
(Pentagon is 19.47 miles from particle beam at NIST also line-of-sight.)
All those facts remain independently verifiable today.
May ‘mean nothing’ but unlikely.
Hutchison Effect requires as its third part a particle beam. Second part is RF microwave radiation. First part is high-voltage gradient (Hurricane Erin charged the atmosphere that fateful day of 911).
No doubt probably all Totalle CoinciDunce.
The buildings coming down in their own footprint is physically impossible. It was an inside job.
I’m a structural engineer with a lot of experience in structural steel design. Gerald Posner got almost everything right here. At one point, he called a column a girder (a column is a vertical member into which a horizontal member — a girder — frames). He made a couple of other small errors of nomenclature that were easily understood. Not a big deal Overall, it was a very good explanation. I tell people this: everybody has seen video of a blacksmith working metal. He heats it up and shapes it. As it cools, it becomes harder to shape, so he has to reheat it. Hotter steel is softer steel, and it can become very soft, yet at no time is the steel melted. The same thing happened at the WTC. The steel got hot, which made it easier to bend.
—
many kilotons of structural steel were not all heated by a few thousands of gallons of jet fuel (most of which burned off in big fireballs) and some burning carpet and ceiling tiles, sufficiently and at the same time such as to cause perfect failure of everything necessary to allow ‘into-own-footprint’ fall, and at greater than 10 floors per second collapse speed LOL . instead, kilotons of steel were turned into dust by resonant energy weapon called HUTCHISON EFFECT, as evidenced by seismic impact of a dumptruck driving by, per Dr Judy Wood. all evidence best points to this military mechanism and nowhere else.
Early in the construction of the towers, local government in conjunction with the EPA prevented the use of asbestos as fireproofing on the structural steel. Engineers at the time stated their doubt that asbestos substitutes could be effective. This was covered in a ’60 Minutes’ segment in either the Ford or Carter administration.
Available on youtube, a REAL KICKER is the 1979 Season 1 Episode 1 of CONNECTIONS 1 science series (titled TRIGGER EFFECT) by James Burke in which flight 911 almost crashes into Manhattan skyscraper. LOL TALK ABOUT PREDICTIVE CONDITIONING
