DEW vs RM Palmer Chocolates, W Reading PA 2023

Inconsistencies / DEW Hallmarks

  • Insta-burned flesh — no evidence of flames having entered the truck, yet 3rd degree burns over 20% of the body — body was mostly clothed in cold weather.
  • White-grey off-gassing due to molecular dissociation
  • Total annihilation of brick building
  • Warped, wilted steel girders
  • Insta-rusted steel
  • Glass vanished as if never present
  • Tank implosion without marks on / debris hitting outside
  • Truck hood popped open
  • Evenly-strewn debris field
  • Levitation of heavy objects – adjacent building “shifted 4 feet off its foundation”
  • Electromagnetic distortion of CCTV camera image (and physical aiming) prior to blast wave
  • NTSB involvement (captured agency)
  • Firenado-like plasma path
  • 29 / 9 2 numeracy
  • Electromagnetic pull disrupts neighboring structures
  • Fire incommensurate with fuel
  • Re-re-ignition of flames
  • Underground pipes crush-damaged similar to PEPCON 1989 DEW Attack
  • Sole survivor who dropped into a large stainless steel vat was shielded from microwave burns

This one is trickier because the DEW Hallmarks are less egregious. It appears that “They” are experimenting with lower-power “pulsed” attacks. The electromagnetic effects on the security camera footage prior to and during the blast evidence this.

DEW vs RM Palmer Chocolates, W Reading PA 2023

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

20260909

Leave a Comment