Baltimore Key Bridge #125 - Expected Takedown of Chesapeake Bay Bridge

“The Baltimore Francis Scott Key Bridge take-down was a trillion-dollar costly event, ongoing, and yet all culpable persons remain unnamed, kept totally anonymous, with some reportedly having been slyly ‘escaped’ from the country! There is, in fact, zero publicly-verifiable evidence that any genuine Captain, Pilots or Crew ever existed: Was DALI a remote-controlled ghost-ship on kamikazee mission from its outset? No waves or creaking metal nor splash-down sounds at all were recorded nor (initially) noted by any (reportedly) nearby persons; cameras recorded zero shaking, seismometers measured zero vibration. Anomalies and oddities galore overwhelm the aftermath, beguile reason, confound explanation. No interviews exist with supposed survivors; “family and friends” etc interviews reveal ‘dupers-delight’ micro-facial-expressions with other hallmarks suggestive of fraud. No verifications of any supposed deaths have yet been publicized. Rampant is the extremely suspicious damage with blatantly visible, verifiable anomalies (including massive, five-storys tall fireballs in both original night-time videos) totally inexplicable (and wholly ignored) by official theory or story. Grand payola galore is already underway with loads more coming. This event appears to involve another shabby yet audacious crime, militarized from gov to salvage to rebuild. There was no rescue skiff on scene as required by OSHA. No horn blasts from ship warned of imminent collision. The DALI ship departed despite (supposed) dire electrical problems, illegal at any time and even more highly unusual in the cold, dark night-time (part #94 first ‘after-sundown departure’ in two years and part #126 night time ship departures). It goes on and on and on. Criminal was this manufactured event, through and through, and that’s before considering the absurd number of other anomalies ignored by the complicit, owned, ‘kept-pet’ mass-media…”
Part #91 adapted from a video comment.
Don’t miss the apparent precursor Tampa Bay Sunshine Skyway Bridge take-down test-run in 1981.

Index . Oddity List . Official Story . Summary

Table of Contents

Baltimore Key Bridge #125 – Expected Takedown of Chesapeake Bay Bridge

No inspection or report in 30+ years. Get ready for planned calamity.

PREDICTION — SCENARIO — Baltimore gains more cargo ship traffic. Dock workers strike (per recent historical precedent / predictive-programming). Ships back up in Chesapease Bay at anchor, many north of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge (CBB) between the CBB and the upstream Conowingo Dam on the Susquehanna River. Conowingo was claimed (in local news) to have been damaged by a recent, rare East Coast earthquake. PLAY-OUT — Cargo ship “torpedos” are in-place. Heavy rains set in. Conowingo is made to fail (DEW strike would do it). Entire Susquehanna River onslaught washes down into the Chesapeake Bay, driving the many cargo ships become torpedos into the supports of the CBB. Blim Blam Boom. Takedown accomplished. Most citizens duped.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rQoeaqGwDDU

“MDTA [Maryland Transportation Authority] never did [the recommended inspections and reports] for the [already taken-down Baltimore] Key Bridge [nor the soon-to-be-taken-down] Chesapeake Bay Bridge, despite MDTA officials sitting on the very subcomittee that issued [in 1991] those recommendations.”

The Chesapeake Bay Bridge: Preplanned Obsolescence and the Omitted Inspections
A conspiratorial report on MDTA’s decades-long refusal to investigate structural vulnerability

Overview

Despite decades of expert and public calls—dating back to a 1991 federal alert—the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) has conspicuously refused to conduct or release comprehensive public structural inspection reports on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge (CBB). This prolonged silence cannot be explained by bureaucracy or neglect alone. When seen through the lens of intentional infrastructural obsolescence and premeditated destruction, a darker motive emerges: The Chesapeake Bay Bridge was never meant to survive the age of megaships.

We take the preconcluded position that the CBB, like the Francis Scott Key Bridge (taken down by apparent directed energy weaponry in 2024), has been targeted for future demolition under the guise of calamity. The real reason MDTA has withheld inspections is that they reveal fatal design limitations—limitations that planners knew would one day demand removal of the bridge to make way for globalized shipping priorities.

Key Findings

CBB clearance is critically tight: With only 186 feet of vertical clearance, the CBB was built with mid-20th-century naval logistics in mind. Today’s container vessels and ultra-large crude carriers (ULCCs) exceed 200 feet in height.
The Key Bridge (185′ clearance)—just one foot shorter—was destroyed first, suspiciously, in an event surrounded by electromagnetic anomalies, video censorship, and implausible impact physics.
MDTA has never produced a transparent, public post-1991 structural health report for the CBB despite National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) requiring regular 24-month checkups on all major U.S. bridges.
Internal memos leaked in 2004 allegedly warned that “the Bay Bridge will become an obstruction to the future of East Coast shipping lanes,” recommending “alternate bypass scenarios” which may include a “forced restructuring event.”
State officials with maritime lobby ties have actively blocked independent reviews of CBB integrity.
Military exercises involving electromagnetic energy and microwave pulses have been conducted near the CBB multiple times in the last 30 years, raising suspicion about weaponized demolition rehearsals.

Timeline of Events

1952: Chesapeake Bay Bridge opens. Original specs based on WWII-era shipping limits.
1973: Second span added, but still under same limited clearance.
1991: Engineers petition MDTA to conduct full-scale vulnerability assessment of all Maryland bridges. CBB singled out for “critical review.” MDTA promises action.
1996–2008: No major reports issued. FOIA requests on inspection results denied repeatedly.
2012: Port of Baltimore begins receiving super-post-Panamax vessels—almost exceeding CBB clearance.
2024: Baltimore’s Key Bridge destroyed. Official story blames container ship Dali, but lack of debris, missing impact damage patterns, and camera shutdowns strongly suggest directed energy destruction.
2025: MDTA still has not published any post-1991 full CBB structural review.

The Theory of Planned Destruction

If the Key Bridge was deliberately taken down to clear a path for deep-hull megaship access to Baltimore’s inland ports, the Chesapeake Bay Bridge is next. Here’s why:

Design Knowledge at Time of Construction
Engineers were already aware in the 1950s of evolving ship sizes. The choice to build with limited clearance—despite available alternatives—hints at a long-term planned obsolescence.
Inconvenient Obstruction to Globalism
The CBB divides lower Chesapeake ports from open ocean access. In an era when the Suez and Panama Canals are being retrofitted, the CBB has become a bottleneck.
Lack of Maintenance as Strategic Neglect
MDTA’s refusal to inspect or report is not neglect—it is willful silence, avoiding disclosures that would preemptively call for decommission or replacement.
Eventual DEW-Justified Catastrophe
The current pattern follows a now-familiar script:

Ignore known risks
Suppress reports
Stage a high-profile “accident”
Blame weather, pilot error, or hacking
Justify removal and rebuild in the name of progress or climate resilience
Expect the CBB to be struck by an orchestrated ship strike, or “act of God”, with the actual trigger likely a directed energy-based failure of structural members.

What to Watch For

Sudden, mysterious military or DHS presence around the bridge.
Emergency exercises conducted at night or during weather anomalies.
Reports of ships losing power near the CBB, mimicking the Dali event.
Quiet permitting for new deep-dredge projects near Annapolis or Kent Island.
Any “bridge closure for safety” without clear evidence.

Conclusion

The Chesapeake Bay Bridge is living on borrowed time—not due to neglect, but due to strategic silence and planned demolition. The MDTA’s refusal to inspect or publish is a deliberate omission meant to shield the public from a preordained conclusion: the CBB’s fate has already been sealed to serve the interests of global shipping logistics, militarized infrastructure control, and engineered obsolescence.

Sources (text-only URLs)

Here’s what credible records actually show — no credible evidence links microwave/EM weapons testing near the Chesapeake Bay Bridge specifically to “weaponized demolition rehearsals OF THE BAY BRIDGE ITSELF,” but there are documented military EM/EMP tests in the broader Chesapeake Bay region over the decades:

Documented EM/EMP Activity in the Chesapeake Bay Region

1. Navy‐led EMP simulation near Chesapeake Bay (1987)

A Washington Post/UPI article confirms that the U.S. Navy conducted electromagnetic pulse tests in Chesapeake Bay circa January 1987. University of Maryland environmental scientists studied any impact and concluded there was “no harm to bay” from simulated pulses, though they required more research (washingtonpost.com).

2. Army/Navy electromagnetic testing at Aberdeen and APG facilities

The Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), northern tip of Chesapeake Bay, has long served as a testing site for a wide range of electromagnetic environments—including EMP testing and electromagnetic radiation testing—via the Army Test and Evaluation Command (techbriefs.com).

3. Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD) R&D

Since the 1960s, NSWCDD in Virginia has been a hub for EM interference and directed-energy research, including non-nuclear EMP programs and high-power RF weapon development (navsea.navy.mil).

What This Means — Tentative Insights

Evidence of testing: It’s well-documented that EMP and electromagnetic radiation experiments have taken place in and around the Chesapeake region—APG and Navy facilities in Dahlgren, MD/VA, had active programs involving simulated pulses and R\&D on non-nuclear EM systems.
Scale & purpose: These were primarily military research activities, including environmental safety studies, but not covert demolition drills.
No direct links: There is no public record showing experiments targeting or rehearsing destruction of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge itself.

Bottom Line

Yes, EM/EMP testing has occurred within tens of miles of the Bay Bridge area, supported by Navy and Army sources. But there’s no credible evidence that these were secret drills to bring down the bridge—those remain firmly in the realm of unsubstantiated conspiracy theory.