Baltimore Key Bridge #155 – Anti-Gravitics of DEW – Bridges and Skyscrapers Fall Faster Than Gravity

Maybe the electromagnetics inherent in DEW interplay with metal content of target items to affect attraction / repulsion mimicking ‘levitation’ and/or localized ‘anti-gravity’. WTC fell faster than gravity. BFSKB fell out from under work trucks. Oliveira Bridge fell out from under motorcycle (and motorcycle out from under rider). Dr Judy Wood noted these peculiar effects early on. Evidence examination over time and additional suspected DEW Attack sites continues to support the effect(s).

“The Baltimore Francis Scott Key Bridge take-down was a trillion-dollar costly event, ongoing, and yet all culpable persons remain unnamed, kept totally anonymous, with some reportedly having been slyly ‘escaped’ from the country! There is, in fact, zero publicly-verifiable evidence that any genuine Captain, Pilots or Crew ever existed: Was DALI a remote-controlled ghost-ship on kamikazee mission from its outset? No waves or creaking metal nor splash-down sounds at all were recorded nor (initially) noted by any (reportedly) nearby persons; cameras recorded zero shaking, seismometers measured zero vibration. Anomalies and oddities galore overwhelm the aftermath, beguile reason, confound explanation. No genuine interviews exist with supposed survivors, raw, uncut and devoid of presumed “duper’s delight” — “family and friends” etc interviews suggest ‘dupers-delight’ micro-facial-expressions with other hallmarks suggestive of glee at successfully duping. No independent verifications of claimed deaths have yet been publicized. Rampant is the extremely suspicious damage with blatantly visible, verifiable anomalies (including massive, five-storys tall fireballs in both original night-time videos) totally inexplicable and wholly ignored by official theory or story. Grand payola galore is already underway with loads more coming. This event appears to involve another shabby yet audacious crime, militarized from gov to salvage to rebuild. There was no rescue skiff on scene as required by OSHA. No horn blasts from ship warned of danger let alone imminent collision. The DALI ship departed despite (supposed) dire electrical problems, illegal at any time and even more highly unusual in the cold, dark night-time (part #94 first ‘after-sundown departure’ in two years and part #126 night time ship departures). It goes on and on and on. Criminal was this manufactured event, through and through, and that’s before considering the absurd number of other anomalies ignored by the complicit, owned, ‘kept-pet’ mass-media…”

Above from Part #91 adapted from a video comment.
Precursor Tampa Bay Sunshine Skyway Bridge take-down test-run in 1981.
DALI test-run (M/V Delta Mariner, Kentucky Lake, Eggner Ferry Bridge) Jan 2012.
Contrast the nearly-absent splash-down, video-shaking, audible or seismic-signal of the BFSKB takedown versus the much shorter, lighter, and less massive yet far greater splash-down of the Eggner Ferry Bridge takedown.

Index . Oddity List . Official Story . Summary

WTC in NYC on 911

In her book WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO, Dr Judy Wood calculated that the twin towers both fell faster than gravity: both towers powderized / “dustified” and appeared to fully collapse faster than would have a bowling ball dropped from their rooftops.

Baltimore FSK Bridge 2024

Bridge appears to fall out from under two work vehicles. The non-damaged work truck supposedly dredged from the site evidences a kind of levitation and/or buffering (though perhaps merely ramping down) from crushing due to fall / impact with water.

Baltimore Key Bridge #59 – No appreciable sliding of work trucks – Bridge appears to fall faster from under center two trucks

Baltimore Key Bridge #36 – The Hoisted Truck Zero Mud Zero Damage Pristine

Oliveira Bridge Brazil 2024

Bridge falls faster than motorcycle. Motorcycle initially begins to fall out from the under the rider. Mass of (electromagnetically reactive) steel may factor into energetics.

PINK MAELSTROM Close-up Video Inside a Suspected DEW Attack Blast

Tornadics

Dr Judy Wood notes in her book WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO that levitations and/or electrogavitics (“anti-gravity”) are often noted side-effects of tornadoes — everyone is familiar with the undamaged cattle and undamaged flying 18-wheelers (dramatized in 1996 TWISTER movie).

Free-fall speed of any Object under Gravitational Acceleration

t_s	v_ft_s	v_mph	distance_fallen_ft
0	0	0	0
0.1	3.217	2.194	0.161
0.2	6.435	4.387	0.643
0.3	9.652	6.581	1.448
0.4	12.87	8.775	2.574
0.5	16.087	10.968	4.022
0.6	19.304	13.162	5.791
0.7	22.522	15.356	7.883
0.8	25.739	17.549	10.296
0.9	28.957	19.743	13.03
1	32.174	21.937	16.087
1.1	35.391	24.13	19.465
1.2	38.609	26.324	23.165
1.3	41.826	28.518	27.187
1.4	45.044	30.712	31.531
1.5	48.261	32.905	36.196
1.6	51.478	35.099	41.183
1.7	54.696	37.293	46.491
1.8	57.913	39.486	52.122
1.9	61.131	41.68	58.074
2	64.348	43.874	64.348
2.1	67.565	46.067	70.944
2.2	70.783	48.261	77.861
2.3	74	50.455	85.1
2.4	77.218	52.648	92.661
2.5	80.435	54.842	100.544
2.6	83.652	57.036	108.748
2.7	86.87	59.229	117.274
2.8	90.087	61.423	126.122
2.9	93.305	63.617	135.292
3	96.522	65.81	144.783
3.1	99.739	68.004	154.596
3.2	102.957	70.198	164.731
3.3	106.174	72.391	175.187
3.4	109.392	74.585	185.966
3.5	112.609	76.779	197.066
3.6	115.826	78.973	208.488
3.7	119.044	81.166	220.231
3.8	122.261	83.36	232.296
3.9	125.479	85.554	244.683
4	128.696	87.747	257.392
4.1	131.913	89.941	270.422
4.2	135.131	92.135	283.775
4.3	138.348	94.328	297.449
4.4	141.566	96.522	311.444
4.5	144.783	98.716	325.762
4.6	148	100.909	340.401
4.7	151.218	103.103	355.362
4.8	154.435	105.297	370.644
4.9	157.653	107.49	386.249
5	160.87	109.684	402.175
5.1	164.087	111.878	418.423
5.2	167.305	114.071	434.992
5.3	170.522	116.265	451.884
5.4	173.74	118.459	469.097
5.5	176.957	120.652	486.632
5.6	180.174	122.846	504.488
5.7	183.392	125.04	522.667
5.8	186.609	127.234	541.167
5.9	189.827	129.427	559.988
6	193.044	131.621	579.132
6.1	196.261	133.815	598.597
6.2	199.479	136.008	618.384
6.3	202.696	138.202	638.493
6.4	205.914	140.396	658.924
6.5	209.131	142.589	679.676
6.6	212.348	144.783	700.75
6.7	215.566	146.977	722.145
6.8	218.783	149.17	743.863
6.9	222.001	151.364	765.902
7	225.218	153.558	788.263
7.1	228.435	155.751	810.946
7.2	231.653	157.945	833.95
7.3	234.87	160.139	857.276
7.4	238.088	162.332	880.924
7.5	241.305	164.526	904.894
7.6	244.522	166.72	929.185
7.7	247.74	168.913	953.798
7.8	250.957	171.107	978.733
7.9	254.175	173.301	1003.99
8	257.392	175.494	1029.568
8.1	260.609	177.688	1055.468
8.2	263.827	179.882	1081.69
8.3	267.044	182.076	1108.233
8.4	270.262	184.269	1135.099
8.5	273.479	186.463	1162.286
8.6	276.696	188.657	1189.795
8.7	279.914	190.85	1217.625
8.8	283.131	193.044	1245.777
8.9	286.349	195.238	1274.251
9	289.566	197.431	1303.047
9.1	292.783	199.625	1332.164
9.2	296.001	201.819	1361.604
9.3	299.218	204.012	1391.365
9.4	302.436	206.206	1421.447
9.5	305.653	208.4	1451.852
9.6	308.87	210.593	1482.578
9.7	312.088	212.787	1513.626
9.8	315.305	214.981	1544.995
9.9	318.523	217.174	1576.687
10	321.74	219.368	1608.7

Official Heights of WTC Towers

Building	Roof Height	Maximum Height (inc. spire/antenna)
Original North Tower (1 WTC)	1,368 ft (417 m)	1,727 ft (526.3 m)
Original South Tower (2 WTC)	1,362 ft (415 m)	1,362 ft (415 m)

Official Collapse Times of WTC Towers

The exact collapse times of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, have been forensically documented down to the second. While there is universal agreement on the South Tower’s timeline, there is a minor three-second discrepancy between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the 9/11 Commission regarding the North Tower.

Official Collapse Durations (from Visual + Seismic Data)

When evaluating the exact timing of the World Trade Center collapses, the data must be divided into two distinct metrics: the duration of the fall and the exact seismic timestamps of the events.

Here is the official, documented data for both.

1. Collapse Duration (Elapsed Time)

If you are looking for the exact number of seconds it took for the buildings to fall, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provided official estimates. However, NIST explicitly stated that a measurement down to a 1/10th of a second is forensically impossible for the Twin Towers. This is because massive dust clouds rapidly obscured the lower sections of both buildings, preventing video analysis from pinpointing the exact fraction of a second the primary mass impacted the street level.

Based on the available video and physical evidence, NIST’s official estimated durations for the first exterior panels to strike the ground are:

• WTC 1 (North Tower): Approximately 11 seconds
• WTC 2 (South Tower): Approximately 9 seconds

(Note: While NIST could not measure the Twin Towers’ duration to a fraction of a second, forensic video analysis did allow them to calculate an exact 2.25-second period of free-fall acceleration for the collapse of WTC 7 later that afternoon).

2. Exact Seismic Timestamps (Time of Day)

If you are looking for the exact time of day down to the second, the most precise forensic measurements come from seismometers stationed 21 miles away at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

While NIST provides the time of collapse initiation (the visual moment the upper block began to drop), the seismic data pinpoints the exact seconds the structural mass hit the ground, registering as localized earthquakes (Magnitude 2.1 for WTC 2 and Magnitude 2.3 for WTC 1).

WTC 2 (South Tower)

• Visual Collapse Initiation (NIST): 9:58:59 a.m. EDT
• Primary Seismic Ground Impact: 9:59:04 a.m. EDT

WTC 1 (North Tower)

• Visual Collapse Initiation (NIST): 10:28:22 a.m. EDT
• Primary Seismic Ground Impact: 10:28:31 a.m. EDT

911 WTC: Not Faster Than Gravity, but Faster Than Possibility

The towers supposedly “collapsed” one floor into the next, etc. Because the collision of each floor into the next would inherently consume energy, slow the speed, and make the fall take longer than a gravity-only / zero-resistance fall, this series of 110 floor-by-floor collapses inescapably slows the possible speed of total collapse; however, the buildings both fell at approximately the speed of gravity, necessitating the literal impossibility of zero resistance of any kind. Therefore, additional force was required (pushing or pulling) to dustify the concrete, jellify the steel, and make the buildings fall not faster than gravity but fall faster than they could have had their not beein the dustifying and jellifying energy applied.

In other words: A standard, floor-by-floor collapse would inherently be slowed down by the kinetic energy required to break through the structure of each successive floor. Because the towers fell at approximately free-fall speed—which indicates effectively zero structural resistance—a natural, gravity-driven collapse contradicts the laws of physics. Therefore, an external energy force must have been applied to “dustify” the concrete and “jellify” the steel, completely removing the building’s structural resistance and allowing the mass to fall faster (as it measurably and verifiably did) than it ever could have in a traditional floor-by-floor collapse.

—

Here is the specific data and mathematical framework Dr. Judy Wood uses to calculate her claim regarding the collapse times of the World Trade Center towers.

1. The “Billiard Ball” Baseline Data (Free-Fall Calculation)

Wood begins by establishing the absolute minimum time it would take an object to hit the ground if it were dropped from the roof of the towers in a vacuum, with zero structural or aerodynamic resistance. She refers to this as the “billiard ball” calculation.

• Height of WTC 1 (North Tower) Roof: 1,368 feet (417 meters)
• Acceleration of Gravity ($g$): $9.8 \text{ m/s}^2$ or $32.2 \text{ ft/s}^2$

Using the standard kinematic equation for distance:

$$d = \frac{1}{2}gt^2$$

Solving for time ($t$):

$$t = \sqrt{\frac{2d}{g}}$$

$$t = \sqrt{\frac{2(417)}{9.8}} \approx 9.22 \text{ seconds}$$

Wood uses 9.22 seconds as the absolute theoretical baseline for a free-fall drop.

2. The Fall Time Data

Wood juxtaposes this theoretical baseline with the generally cited times for the actual collapse. She utilizes data points accepted by early National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reports, the 9/11 Commission, and visual observations of the debris:

• Cited Fall Times: Approximately 9 to 11 seconds.

Because the observed fall times align so closely with the 9.22-second “billiard ball” baseline, she bases her subsequent calculations on the premise that the upper block fell at or near free-fall acceleration.

3. The Conservation of Momentum Calculation

To argue that a gravity-driven “pancake collapse” cannot occur at this speed, Wood relies on the physical law of conservation of momentum for inelastic collisions.

Her framework assumes that if the upper block of the building (the falling mass) drops and strikes the stationary lower floors, the two masses must combine. The equation for this transfer is:

$$m_1v_1 = (m_1 + m_2)v_2$$

Where:

• $m_1$ = The falling mass (upper block).
• $v_1$ = The velocity of the upper block right before impact.
• $m_2$ = The mass of the stationary floor it hits.
• $v_2$ = The new, combined velocity after impact.

Because $(m_1 + m_2)$ is larger than $m_1$, the new velocity ($v_2$) must be less than the initial velocity ($v_1$).

Wood’s mathematical model dictates that at every single floor impact (110 floors), the falling mass must inherently lose velocity just to transfer momentum to the stationary mass below it. This is before accounting for the kinetic energy required to actually break, buckle, and pulverize the steel and concrete.

When calculated floor-by-floor using conservation of momentum, a gravity-driven collapse through intact structural steel would yield a theoretical fall time extending to 30 seconds, 90 seconds, or longer, depending on the assumed resistance parameters.

4. The Final Calculation & Conclusion

Wood’s argument for a “faster than gravity” or “faster than free-fall” anomaly is a comparative deduction based on the data above:

1. Calculated time for a collapse involving momentum transfer and structural resistance: >30 seconds.
2. Observed time of the collapse: ~9 to 11 seconds.
3. Calculated time of a billiard ball dropped in a vacuum (zero resistance): 9.22 seconds.

Wood calculates that for the upper block to fall in 9 to 11 seconds, the physics required by the equation $m_1v_1 = (m_1 + m_2)v_2$ cannot have occurred. Therefore, she concludes that the lower mass ($m_2$) and its structural resistance must have been entirely negated, removed, or “dustified” before the upper mass hit it, allowing the roofline to fall virtually unhindered at the speed of gravity.