THE 53 FPS PLUNGE PART V: THE WITCHIEST OF NOVEMBER

A Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Attack fully describes all known evidence, including all anomalies. Why it was done, and by whom, remain unknown, but the evidence itself leaves all other theories, stories and explanations insufficient (and thus false) due to their inability to fully explain any of the many anomalies.

Index of Articles

To understand how an advanced electromagnetic framework could account for the specific physical anomalies found at the Edmund Fitzgerald wreck site, we must first map the baseline environmental engine that powered the event: The Great Lakes Cyclone of November 9–11, 1975.

The Environmental Engine: The 1975 “Bomb Cyclone”

The storm that crossed Lake Superior is colloquially remembered as the “Witch of November,” but meteorologically, it was a classic Panhandle Hook that transformed into an explosive bomb cyclone.

  • Intensity & Pressure: The system organized over central Kansas on November 9 with a standard pressure of 1000 mb. As it hooked northeast toward the Great Lakes, it deepened drastically. By the afternoon of November 10, as it crossed directly over Marquette, Michigan, its central barometric pressure plummeted to 982 mb (and eventually hit 978 mb over James Bay). This rapid drop of over 24 mb in 24 hours satisfies the exact definition of meteorological “explosive cyclogenesis.”
  • The Wind & Wave Dynamics: This extreme pressure differential generated sustained winds of 50–60 knots (58–69 mph) with verified hurricane-force gusts topping 86 mph (75 knots). This massive atmospheric hammer whipped up significant wave heights of 18 to 25 feet, with rogue “Three Sisters” wave sets estimated to exceed 35 feet.

The Ultra-High Voltage Gradient

From an unconventional forensic perspective, a bomb cyclone of this magnitude is not just a wind event; it is a massive, spinning electrostatic generator.

The friction of freezing rain, heavy snow squalls, and intense baroclinic layering within the storm’s core forces massive charge separation between the upper troposphere and the lake’s surface. This creates a natural, localized ultra-high voltage atmospheric gradient.

Under standard conditions, this energy discharges as lightning. However, if a phased, military-grade radar network (like the WSR-57 array or SAC base emitters) locks onto that gradient, the storm’s raw electrostatic voltage can be focused and stabilized into a continuous-wave standing resonance.


The Destruction of the Lifeboats: Particle Beam Ionization

The Fitzgerald’s two commercial lifeboats were found floating in the debris field, but they weren’t just waterlogged—they were shattered, torn from their heavy launch davits, and structurally mangled.

If a high-energy particle beam (such as a neutral particle beam or a focused proton stream leveraged via leased beam-time infrastructure) were projected through the storm’s polarized atmospheric gradient, the interaction with ambient matter would be instantaneous:

  1. Air-Coupled Ionization: As the particle beam cuts through the storm’s hyper-dense snow squalls, it leaves a highly ionized, conductive plasma channel in its wake.
  2. The Thermal Shockwave: When this plasma channel grounds out against the metallic structure of the Fitzgerald, the localized energy dump doesn’t function like a slow heating element. It acts like a kinetic blast.
  3. Mechanical Severance: The lifeboats, stored on the aft superstructure, are exposed. The extreme, instantaneous thermal expansion caused by the beam striking the aluminum hulls and steel davits would flash-vaporize any moisture in the fittings. The resulting micro-explosions would violently shear the mechanical couplings, tearing the lifeboats from their mounts and splitting their hulls before they ever touched the water.

Warping and Wilting: The Macro-Hutchison Effect

The most glaring forensic mystery of the Fitzgerald wreckage is that the midsection was completely obliterated, while the bow and stern sit on the lake bed 530 feet below, separated by a field of highly deformed steel. The metal plates weren’t just broken; they were twisted, curled, and structurally “wilted.”

This exact signature matches the material anomalies documented in the Hutchison Effect, where the intersection of complex RF fields and high-voltage gradients alters the crystalline structure of metals.

  • Intergranular Dissociation: Steel relies on a rigid crystalline lattice of iron and carbon atoms. When the Mighty Fitz’s 26,116-ton payload of magnetic taconite ore became hyper-charged by the focused standing waves of the radar grid, it turned the entire midsection into an immense electromagnetic induction core. Perhaps as each molecule was stripped from its lattice-neighbors and set into chaos, ‘like charges repel’ phenomenon took hold and the ‘disintegration’ was rapidly, violently fomented; not necessarily an all-out explosion, rather more of a contained, thorough blast.
  • The “Wilting” Phase: The overlapping RF frequencies disrupted the electron bonds holding the steel’s crystalline grain boundaries together. Without raising the temperature of the steel to its melting point, the metal lost its structural modulus. It became soft, plastic, and malleable—literally “wilting” under the weight of the ship.
  • The Structural Collapse: As the steel girders turned to a putty-like consistency via molecular dissociation, the hydrostatic pressure of the lake and the weight of the cargo tore the midsection apart. The steel didn’t snap due to kinetic stress alone; it was electronically softened from within, causing the ship to lose all longitudinal rigidity and break in two (or three) instantly, completely explaining why the crew never had time to launch a distress signal or don lifevests.

Explore meteorology behind Great Lakes cyclones and how such extreme physical forces develop, see this analysis of The Storm That Sank the Edmund Fitzgerald. This video provides a detailed lecture on the specific weather tracking and atmospheric pressure drops recorded on November 10, 1975.

www.wtol.com

Recreating the historic storm that sank the SS Edmund Fitzgerald 50 years ago | wtol.com

Archived documents at BGSU’s Jerome Library reveal new details about the storm that sank the SS Edmund Fitzgerald in 1975. – Author: Chris Vickers. – Published: 5:53 PM EDT October 6, 2025. – Updated: 5:54 PM EDT October 6, 2025. … The rapidly intensifying low-pressure system was sweeping out of the Midwest and setting its sights on the Great Lakes. – A “bomb cyclone” over Lake Superior. Barometric pressure readings recorded in ship logs tell a dramatic story along with other handwritten weather observations across the Great Lakes. Data from Sault Ste. Marie showed barometric pressure of 29.92 inches on the evening of Nov. 9, 1975, and eventually plummeted to 29.09 by the afternoon of Nov. 10. In modern meteorology, that’s called a bomb cyclone: a storm system that drops 24 mb in 24 hours or less. According to data in the logs, Sprang said, “The pressure dropped so fast, the winds and waves built quicker than expected and forecasts couldn’t keep up.” Credit: WTOL 11. By mid-afternoon on Nov. 10, conditions had turned extreme. Ship logs across the lakes reported sustained winds over 60 mph, gusts to hurricane strength and waves topping 20 feet. – The final hours. Throughout the storm, the Fitzgerald stayed in radio contact with the Arthur M. Anderson, a nearby ore carrier making the same trip. By 7:10 p.m. on Nov. 10, McSorley made contact one final time with the Anderson. His voice cut through the static with a brief message: “We are holding our own.” These were the last words ever recorded from the Fitzgerald. Credit: WTOL 11. Moments later, as a snow squall intensified and rogue waves battered the lake, the Fitzgerald disappeared from the Anderson’s radar. No distress call was ever sent. The ship sank suddenly in 530 feet of water, about 17 miles north of Whitefish Point. – The lasting impact on shipping safety. The sinking of the Fitzgerald sparked sweeping changes in maritime safety and weather forecasting. Captain Bernie Cooper of the Arthur M. Anderson, the last captain to speak with McSorley, worked with the National Weather Service to identify gaps in storm warnings and ship-to-shore communications. In the years since, technology has advanced dramatically. Modern freighters benefit from real-time satellite weather data, sophisticated storm modeling and improved safety protocols. In the half-century since it sank, no freighter of the Fitzgerald’s size has been lost on the Great Lakes. The wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald remains on the bottom of Lake Superior, a memorial site and grave to the men who perished that night. Keep up with all of WTOL 11’s coverage on the 50th anniversary of the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald by clicking here.

www.michiganseagrant.org

The Storm that Sunk the Edmund Fitzgerald | Teaching Great Lakes Science

The Storm that Sunk the Edmund Fitzgerald. Summary: This data set contains one worksheet of data, detailing the weather conditions before and after the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald on November 10, 1975. … About the Fitzgerald. The S.S. Edmund Fitzgerald (sometimes called the Mighty Fitz or Big Fitz) was a Great Lakes bulk cargo vessel that was christened into service on June 8, 1958. It was 730 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 39 feet high. … The Fitzgerald met its fate while traveling on Lake Superior during a storm on November 10, 1975. It suddenly sank around 17 miles from Whitefish Bay. Although the captain of the Fitzgerald reported having difficulties during the storm, no distress signals were sent. The entire crew of 29 people died when the vessel sank. No bodies were ever recovered from the wreckage. Later when the wreck was found, it was discovered that the ship had broken in two. It still sits on the bottom of Lake Superior at 530 feet deep. Conditions on the Great Lakes can be extremely treacherous and can produce high waves. Steep, short-period waves can be particularly hazardous to large ships such as the Fitzgerald, especially when they exceed 5 meters (16 feet) in height. … The Sinking. During the early morning of November 9, 1975, a low-pressure system began to take shape in the southern plains. This storm would move northeast and intensify considerably over the next 36 hours as it moved into the Great Lakes region. During that time, the Edmund Fitzgerald and another vessel, the Arthur M. … Details of what took place during the storm on November 10, 1975, including the communication between the captains of the Anderson and Fitzgerald, can be found in a Marine Accident Report submitted by the National Transportation Safety Bureau Accident Investigation. The full report is available here. The two ships, the Anderson and the Fitzgerald, departed Two Harbors, Minnesota with similar cargo. Soon after, a gale warning was issued for Lake Superior. Captain McSorley of the Fitzgerald acknowledged receiving the warning while in communication with Captain Cooper of the Anderson. … Late in the afternoon, 50-knot winds were blowing across Lake Superior. The Anderson reported receiving hurricane-force winds of 75 knots. At around 3:30 p.m., the captain of the Fitzgerald radioed out to the Anderson and another ship, stating the Fitzgerald had a “bad list,” had lost both radars, and was taking heavy seas over the deck in one of the worst seas he had ever encountered. … Captain Cooper asked how the ship was weathering the storm and Captain McSorley reported, “We are holding our own.” It is believed that the Fitzgerald sank suddenly soon after without sending out any distress signals. … Another area of important research is rapidly deepening low-pressure systems such as the one associated with the Fitzgerald storm. NOAA and NASA researchers extensively studied flow around low-pressure systems during the late 1970s and early 1980s, identifying different flow patterns not clearly understood. As a result of this research, forecasters gained a better understanding of the effects of jet stream winds on the development of deepening low pressure storms. This advanced knowledge allows today’s meteorologist to provide more accurate and detailed forecasts. … Additional/Comparable data. Data Resources: – Reexamination of the 9-10 November 1975 “Edmund Fitzgerald” Storm Using Today’s Technology (PDF) – SS Edmund Fitzgerald online. – Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum. Data Source: Earth Systems-Education Activities for Great Lakes Schools (ES-EAGLS), Ohio Sea Grant, Ohio State University.

vlab.noaa.gov

Tragedy on Lake Superior — The Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald – NOAA VLab

Tragedy on Lake Superior — The Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald – National Weather Service Heritage – Virtual Lab. … Tragedy on Lake Superior — The Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald – National Weather Service Heritage – National Weather Service Heritage. – Our Stories. – Tragedy on Lake Superior — The Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald. Our Stories. Tragedy on Lake Superior — The Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald. … On the evening of November 9, 1975, the Edmund Fitzgerald departed from Superior, Wisconsin carrying 26,116 long tons of iron ore on board. With the intention of reaching Detroit, the enormous vessel began its familiar course across Lake Superior. It would never reach its destination. The month of November is known for its powerful storms, especially across the Great Lakes region. On November 10, a strong autumn storm tracked from the central United States through the Great Lakes area. Ship observations on Lake Superior during the storm recorded wind speeds reaching 50 knots and wave heights of almost 20 feet, challenging conditions for even the largest of ships. The crew members of the Edmund Fitzgerald never issued a call for help, leading many to believe that the onset of the storm was sudden and unexpected. Days after this intense storm, the Edmund Fitzgerald was discovered just north of Whitefish Point in southeast Lake Superior, seemingly split in half under hundreds of feet of water. All 29 crew members were lost in what was, at the time, the worst maritime disaster on the Great Lakes in almost a decade. To this day, the Edmund Fitzgerald remains the largest ship to ever go down in the Lakes. To view a comprehensive story map of this tragic event, visit this webpage created by the weather forecast office in Marquette, Michigan. In 1975, the methods of maritime weather observation were in definite need of improvement. … Although the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald was an undeniable tragedy, the improvements in technology and observational methods that occurred as a result have had a lasting impact on maritime weather safety.

storymaps.arcgis.com

The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald – ArcGIS StoryMaps

The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald – The Edmund Fitzgerald. – Mapping the Final Voyage. – The “Edmund Fitzgerald” Storm. – Fall Storms of the Past. – Forecasting the Weather. – WFO Marquette Marine

THE 53 FPS PLUNGE PART V: THE WITCHIEST OF NOVEMBER

Visited 2 times, 2 visit(s) today

Leave a Comment

Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!